logo
ImageImage
Finance Automation Case Study

Transaction Matching Software Case Study

A matching engine that reconciles millions of bank, gateway, and ledger transactions automatically — surfacing only the exceptions that need a human.

Transaction Matching Software Case Study

About the client

The client is a high-volume payments and commerce business processing transactions across multiple banks, card processors, and wallet providers. Their finance team was matching settlement files against the general ledger by hand in spreadsheets. As transaction volume grew past a million records a month, matching became the single biggest bottleneck in the close process — and the biggest source of unexplained variances.

96%

Auto-Match Rate

2 Days

Month-End Close

1.4M+

Transactions Matched Monthly

Business Name

Fintech Company

Location

United States

Industry

Finance

Problem Statement

Every settlement cycle produced files in different formats with different identifiers, fee deductions, and timing. Analysts pasted them into spreadsheets and matched line by line, chasing pennies of variance across thousands of rows. Errors were invisible until the auditors found them, and no one could explain how a match decision had been made weeks later.

    Key Challenges

  • Format Fragmentation

    Each bank and gateway delivered a different file layout, date convention, and fee structure that had to be normalized by hand.

  • Slow Manual Matching

    Analysts spent 60+ hours per cycle matching rows, leaving no time for actual variance investigation.

  • Unexplained Variances

    Partial settlements, split payouts, and FX rounding created breaks nobody could trace back to a source record.

  • No Audit Trail

    Match decisions lived in spreadsheet cells with no history, making audit support painful and error-prone.

Same Problem? Let's Talk
alt text
alt text
alt text
alt text
Solution for BidBuddy

The Solution

We built a dedicated transaction matching platform with a configurable rules engine, fuzzy and many-to-many matching, and an AI-assisted suggestion layer for the residual exceptions. Ingestion adapters normalize every source file on arrival; the engine matches one-to-one, one-to-many, and many-to-many relationships; and everything that cannot be matched with confidence is routed to an exception workspace with suggested pairings and a full decision log.

Key Results

Matching Accuracy

  • 96% of transactions auto-matched without human review.
  • Fuzzy tolerance rules absorbed fee and FX rounding differences.
  • Many-to-many logic resolved split and batched settlements correctly.

Speed & Capacity

  • Month-end close reduced from 9 days to 2.
  • 1.4M+ monthly transactions processed with no headcount increase.
  • New bank or gateway onboarded in days via config, not code.

Control & Audit

  • Immutable audit trail on every match, unmatch, and write-off.
  • Maker-checker approval on all manual matches above threshold.
  • Aging dashboards on open breaks by source, owner, and value.

Our Approach

01. Data Ingestion & Normalization

  • Mapped every bank, gateway, and ledger file into one canonical schema
  • Built SFTP, API, and file-drop adapters with duplicate detection
  • Standardized dates, currencies, fee lines, and reference identifiers

02. Matching Engine Design

  • Layered exact, tolerance-based, and fuzzy matching passes
  • Added many-to-many logic for split payouts and batched settlements
  • Trained an AI suggestion model on historical analyst match decisions

03. Exceptions & Reporting

  • Built an exception workspace with suggested matches and bulk actions
  • Added maker-checker workflows and write-off controls
  • Added maker-checker workflows and write-off controls
Let’s Make This Your Story
alt text

Key Modules

Ingestion & Normalization

Ingestion & Normalization

  • Adapters for banks, processors, wallets, and the ERP ledger
  • Canonical schema with per-source field mapping
  • Duplicate and late-file detection on every import
Matching Engine

Matching Engine

  • Exact, tolerance, and fuzzy matching passes
  • One-to-one, one-to-many, and many-to-many resolution
  • AI-suggested pairings for residual exceptions
Exception Management

Exception Management

  • Prioritized break queue by value and age
  • Bulk match, split, and write-off actions
  • Maker-checker approval and full decision history
Technologies Used

Technologies Used

  • Frontend: React.js + TypeScript with virtualized data grids
  • Backend: Python + PostgreSQL with a queued matching pipeline
  • AI: gradient-boosted match scoring on historical decisions
  • Infra: AWS (ECS, RDS, S3) with encryption and role-based access

Fintech Company

Client Thoughts

We used to dread settlement day. Now the engine does the matching overnight and my team walks in to a short list of real exceptions instead of a spreadsheet with a hundred thousand rows. Close went from over a week to two days, and for the first time we can prove exactly why every match was made.

Fintech Company Team

alt text

Don't Just Read About Success

Make It Your Reality

You've seen the kind of results we deliver.

If you're facing similar challenges or planning your next big move, let's connect and explore how we can help.